Do You know The Truth on Chemotherapy and Radiation Treatment?
The Problems with Chemo and Radiation in Treating Cancer
Most patients blindly believe their doctor that there is no answer to cancer other than chemotherapy or radiation. Since I will be discussing different natural herbs and alternative cancer treatments in this Substack, you need to understand why you should question if chemo and radiation are the only paths forward.
Cancer is Increasing.
In 2024, over 611,000 deaths from cancer are projected for the US. That’s more than 1,600 deaths from cancer each day.”
#2: This excerpt is from cancer.org on cancer rates, “Cancer incidence, however, is on the rise for many common cancers. In the coming year, we’re expecting to hit a bleak milestone—the first time new cases of cancer in the US are expected to cross the 2-million mark. That’s almost 5,500 cancer diagnoses a day.
This trend is largely affected by the aging and growth of the population and by a rise in diagnoses of 6 of the 10 most common cancers—breast, prostate, endometrial, pancreatic, kidney, and melanoma. (The other 4 top 10 cancers are lung, colon and rectum, bladder, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.)
In 2024, over 611,000 deaths from cancer are projected for the US. That’s more than 1,600 deaths from cancer each day.”
“rising diagnoses of 6 of the most common cancers (breast, prostate, endometrial, pancreatic, kidney, and melanoma) threaten that longstanding downward trend. Put simply, that’s because when more people are diagnosed with cancer, more people are likely to die because of cancer.
Some types of cancer aren’t increasing in overall incidence but are increasing in subgroups. These include:
Colorectal cancer in people younger than age 55
Liver cancer in women
Oral cancers associated with HPV
Cervical cancer in women ages 30 through 44”
Oncologists make a lot of money off your chemo and radiation treatments. They do not get paid if you go with alternative cancer therapies. Isn’t this a conflict of interest?
From Forbes, “Brand-name chemotherapy is often incredibly expensive, in excess of $100,000 per patient. Sometimes there are excellent generic alternatives, but many oncologists are hesitant to prescribe generics because such prescriptions cost them money. For many medicines, you see, oncologists receive a 6% markup, meaning when they infuse a patient with a $10,000 monthly course of chemotherapy, their practice yields an extra $600. By contrast, if the practice treated that patient with a generic chemotherapy, they’d be out most of that extra money.
A private insurer, UnitedHealthcare, tried to incentivize oncologists to prescribe generic chemotherapies by giving them financial bonuses for doing so. For example, a generic medication that would have previously been accompanied by a $12 markup now received a $500 one. That’s a lot of money; but, from the insurer’s perspective, it would have been more than made up by the savings accompanying the use of the generic drug. (In this case, the brand name drug costs $7,000 more than the generic equivalent.)” Forbes
Chemo and Radiation Side Effects
Doctors often downplay the long-term effects.
Do they advise you on the possibility of your treatment causing second cancers to occur? Do they tell you about the side effects and how devasting they may be?
Side Effects Possible below
mouth sores; difficulty swallowing; immune system destruction; gut destruction; hair falls out often; Nausea; vomiting; muscle and bone pain; changes in memory, thinking, and focus (chemo Brain), but changes in memory, thinking, and focus ca n also be caused by other types of cancer treatment (such as radiation to the brain). Hearing and vision changes like hearing loss: endocrine or hormone problems; and problems with sexuality and fertility; decreased lung capacity, pulmonary fibrosis, which is an increase in scar tissue, inflammation in the lungs, and trouble breathing or shortness of breath.
Some of these side effects remain for weeks or months after finishing treatments.
Second Cancers related to chemo and radiation treatments.
The article from The Cancer Society states what all of us in alternative medicine knew all along, “Leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: Past radiation exposure is one risk factor for most kinds of leukemia, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a bone marrow cancer that can turn into acute leukemia, has also been linked to past radiation exposure. The risk of these diseases after radiation treatment for cancer depends on a number of factors, such as:
How much of the bone marrow was exposed to radiation
The amount of radiation that reached the bone marrow
The radiation dose rate (how much was given in each dose, how long it took to give the dose, and how often it was given)
Most often, these cancers develop within several years of a person's radiation treatment. Then the chance of developing a new cancer slowly declines over the following years.
Solid tumors
There is also a risk for other cancers, which are mostly solid tumors, after having radiation therapy. Most of these cancers develop 10 years or more after radiation therapy. The effect of radiation on the risk of developing a solid tumor cancer depends on factors such as:
The age of the patient when they were treated with radiation. For example, the risk of developing breast cancer after radiation is higher in those who were treated when they were young compared with those given radiation as adults. The chance of developing breast cancer after radiation seems to be highest in those exposed as children. Risk decreases as the age at the time of radiation increases; women who had radiation after the age of 40 have a lower risk of breast cancer. Your age when you get radiation treatment has a similar effect on the development of other solid tumors, including lung cancer, thyroid cancer, bone sarcoma, and gastrointestinal or related cancers (stomach, liver, colorectal, and pancreatic).
The dose of radiation. In general, the risk of developing a solid tumor after radiation treatment goes up as the dose of radiation increases. Some cancers require larger doses of radiation than others, and certain treatment techniques use more radiation.
The area treated. The area treated is also important, since these cancers tend to develop in or near the area that was treated with radiation. Certain organs, such as the breast and thyroid, seem to have a higher risk for developing cancers after exposed to radiation than other organs.” The Cancer Society
What are the numbers on how effective chemo and radiation treatments are for patients?
The excerpt below comes from Core Spirit on the ineffectiveness of chemo
Who is Dr. Jones and why should you listen to his warnings. Dr. Jones is one of the nation's top statisticians in the field of cancer is Hardin B. Jones, Ph.D., former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California at Berkeley. has been studying cancer for more than 23 years. He has traveled the world collecting data on the dreaded disease and presented his findings to the American Cancer Society and medical school. ”despite popular belief, chemotherapy doesn’t work. He witnessed a multitude of cancer patients treated with the poison die horrific deaths, many of them meeting their fate much earlier than other patients who chose no treatment at all.
After investigating this further, Dr. Jones found that cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy actually died more quickly, in most cases, than those who followed their doctors’ recommendations by getting the treatment. A few number-crunching efforts later and Dr. Jones exposed a fact that the conventional cancer industry doesn’t want the world to know about its multi-billion-dollar cash cow.
“People who refused treatment lived for an average of 12 and a half years,” stated Dr. Jones about his study’s findings, which were published in the journal Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. “Those who accepted other kinds of treatment lived on an average of only 3 years.”
Breast cancer patients who reject all conventional therapies live four times longer than those who follow the system
Did you catch that? Refusing conventional cancer treatments and doing nothing resulted in cancer patients living more than four times longer than their more compliant counterparts. This is something you’ll never hear about from the mainstream media, which continues to peddle the myth that cancer patients somehow need poison injected into their bodies in order to survive and reach “cure” status.
Dr. Jones’ study also found that the same is true concerning conventional treatments for breast cancer. Women with breast cancer who refused chemotherapy, radiation and surgery – and remained untreated – likewise lived four times longer than women who went under the knife or agreed to be poisoned with chemicals.
As admitted in a more recent study published in the journal Clinical Oncology back in 2004, chemotherapy is really only effective about 2 percent of the time for all cancers. And this is based on the standard five-year survival rate criteria, which isn’t technically indicative of a cure – even though health authorities often like to claim it is.”
The Truth About Chemotherapy: It Kills More Patients than Cancer
The Truth About Cancer site on the effectiveness of chemo and radiation
I hope that all of you will go to the links in this article and read them in depth. Your life may depend on knowing this information.
In my community which is small, I know of at least 25 people in our church who have gotten cancer diagnosis, got chemo and radiation for weeks and months who died anyway. I think living in such a small area, we follow these personal stories more closely than those who live in big cities.
Please come back and read my next Substack. Please help me by following my Substack here.
My website is My Website with articles and resources.